Subjective Factors in Orthodontic Treatment, Q-Methodology as a Tool to the Assessment of Motivation, Compliance and Satisfaction in Orthodontic Treatment: Quaestiones Morales et Ethical Communications (ex lat)

Yulia Bogdanova Peeva^*
Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Correspondence to: Yulia Bogdanova Peeva, Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Received date: September 4, 2024; Accepted date: September 18, 2024; Published date: September 25, 2024
Citation: Peeva YB. Subjective Factors in Orthodontic Treatment, Q-Methodology as a Tool to the Assessment of Motivation, Compliance and Satisfaction in Orthodontic Treatment: Quaestiones Morales et Ethical Communications (ex lat). J Med Res Surg. 2024;5(5):104-109. doi: 10.52916/jmrs244147
Copyright: ©2024 Peeva YB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Introduction: One of the essential factors for evaluating the successful orthodontic treatment is a patient’s satisfaction. The orthodontist can apply very high clinical performance of the tasks set at the beginning, but they do not always coincide with the patient's requests due to the lack of objective assessment. The Q-methodology offers an innovative and qualitative approach that combines the compatibility of many subjective factors and meets the patient's requirements. The research is sociological, specific problems can be explored in depth and fulfil the patient’s expectations. It works with a small number of respondents, and most importantly, it emphasizes the patient-centered approach.
The aim of the present study using Q-methodology was to evaluate the subjective factors in orthodontic treatment and to achieve the best outcomes.
Materials and Methods: Data analysis and statistical processing included Factor Analysis, PQ Method 2.35 with PQROT 2.0. 280 children aged 13 to 18 and 325 parents aged 35 to 55 were studied. The average age for the children was 16.67±2.17, and for the parents 42.18 ± 3.17. An interview (the pilot study) was conducted with 40 respondents, on the basis of which 30 evaluation opinions were formed using the Q-methodology. The studied factors that support children's motivation during orthodontic treatment are compliance and satisfaction as a result.
Results and Discussions: Three factors are summarized for children - the most important is "aesthetics"; four are the factors for parents "prevention of future oral problems" was rated highest by them.
Conclusions: The Q-methodology shares the views of the quantum theory as well, that communicability exists in different probabilistic states. This determines the possibility of subjective factors "to be counted", i.e. to give an objective assessment as a result of subjective factors.

Keywords:

Q-methodology, Subjective factors, Orthodontic treatment.

References

1. Chu JN, Collins JE, Chen TT, et al. Patient and Health Care Worker Perceptions of Communication and Ability to Identify Emotion When Wearing Standard and Transparent Masks. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(11):e2135386.
2. Marler H, Ditton A. "I'm smiling back at you": Exploring the impact of mask wearing on communication in healthcare. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021;56(1):205-214.
3. Card EB, Lejbman J, Trueblood E, et al. Drawing for Visual Communication in Medicine: A Novel Pilot Course for Senior Medical Students. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(2):389-396.
4. Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England, 2010.
5. Mackenbach J, Kunst A. Evidence for strategies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health in Europe. Health Systems, Health, Wealth and Societal Well-being. Assessing the case for investing in health systems, 2012. WHO, Open University Press, htpp://www.openup.co.uk.
6. Tzanov V, Ivanova P, Panteleeva S, et al. Thirty Countries’ Experience. In Changing Inequalities and Social Impacts in Reach Countries. Oxford University Press; 2014.
7. Williams DM, Bentley R, Cobourne MT, et al. Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery: comparison with untreated controls. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47(3):191-195.
8. Zimmermann R, 'Lex Aquilia II', The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 22 Mar. 2012).
9. Perillo L, Esposito M, Caprioglio A, et al. Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the malocclusion impact on self-concept. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:353-359.
10. Prabakaran R, Seymour S, Moles DR, et al. Motivation for orthodontic treatment investigated with Q-methodology: patients' and parents' perspectives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(2):213-220.
11. Price J, Leaver L. ABC of psychological medicine: Beginning treatment. BMJ. 2002;325(7354):33-35.
12. Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67-91.
13. Simonsen R. Chapter 2 - Ethics Considerations in Esthetic Dentistry. In: Principles and Practice of Esthetic Dentistry, 2015;17-44.
14. Lahti S, Suominen-Taipale L, Hausen H. Oral health impacts among adults in Finland: competing effects of age, number of teeth, and removable dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116(3):260-266.
15. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Dev. 1968;39(4):1188-1200.
16. Tang X, Cai J, Lin B, et al. Motivation of adult female patients seeking orthodontic treatment: an application of Q-methodology. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:249-256.
17. Yao L, Xu X, Ni Z, et al. Use of Q methodology to assess the concerns of adult female individuals seeking orthodontic treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:47-55.
18. Batra P, Daing A, Azam I, et al. Impact of altered gingival characteristics on smile esthetics: Laypersons' perspectives by Q sort methodology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(1):82-90
19. Peeva Yulia Bogdanova. Awareness and motivation for orthodontic treatment of children from Plovdiv [thesis]. Plovdiv. 2015;188.
20. Anderson LE, Arruda A, Inglehart MR. Adolescent patients' treatment motivation and satisfaction with orthodontic treatment. Do possible selves matter?. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(5):821-827.
21. Maia NG, Normando D, Maia FA, et al. Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(6):1155-1158.