Journal of Medical Research and Surgery PROVIDES A UNIQUE PLATFORM TO PUBLISH ORIGINAL RESEARCH AND REMODEL THE KNOWLEDGE IN THE AREA OF MEDICAL AND SURGERY

Evaluation of Traumatic Vertebra and Rib Fractures

Indexed Articles

Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

PDF     Google Scholar    
10.52916/jmrs224086

Ahmet Dumanli1*, Suphi Aydin1, Gülcan Gencer2
1Department of Chest Surgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey 2Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey

Correspondence to: Ahmet Dumanli, Department of Chest Surgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
Received date: September 09, 2022;; Accepted date: September 21, 2022; Published date: September 29, 2022
Citation: Dumanli A, Aydin S, Gencer G. Evaluation of Traumatic Vertebra and Rib Fractures. J Med Res Surg. 2022; 3(5): 86-95. doi: 10.52916/jmrs224086
Copyright: ©2022 Dumanli A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between trauma-related thoracic vertebral fractures and/or rib fractures location, age and gender.
Methods: Between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, 100 patients with trauma-related thoracic vertebral fracture and/or rib fracture were included in the study. Rib fractures and thoracic vertebral fractures were analyzed according to age, gender, level and fracture type. The correlation between rib and vertebral fractures was investigated.
Results: 72% of the patients were male and 28% were female, mean age was 48.49 ± 18.83. Thoracic vertebral corpus fractures were detected most frequently in T8 in 22 patients and in T1 in at least 1 patient. Spinous process fracture was found to be highest in T2 with 9 patients, and 1 patient each in T5, T6, and T12. Transverse processes fracture was seen in T9 with a maximum of 5 patients. Rib fractures were observed more frequently on the right. Displaced rib fractures were most common in the 6th and 7th ribs, and non-displaced rib fractures were observed in the 5th ribs with 9 patients. Left rib fractures were most common in the 5th rib, with 6 displaced patients and 8 non-displaced patients. When the thoracic vertebral fractures and rib fractures were examined depending on the age variable, it was determined that the fractures in the T2 spinous, T3 spinous, T5 corpus and T8 vertebral corpus, and rib fractures in the right 4,6,8,10 and left 2 and 4 differ depending on the age variable (p<0.05). When thoracic vertebral fractures and rib fractures were analyzed depending on gender, a correlation was found between T7 vertebral body fractures and left 6th rib fractures (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The coexistence of vertebral and rib fractures should be kept in mind in trauma patients, and plans for diagnosis and treatment should be made accordingly.

Keywords:

Thorax, Rib, Vertebra, Fracture, Trauma

Introduction

Trauma is a condition that occurs as a result of external factors and disrupts the structure of the body [1]. It is the most common cause of death after cancer and heart diseases among all age groups [2,3].

The first known definition of thoracic trauma was made in 1600 BC [3]. Thoracic trauma is the third most common trauma among all trauma cases, present in 40% of trauma cases [4] and [5,6]. Thoracic traumas constitute one third of emergencies and hospitalizations due to trauma among all trauma cases [5,7]. It is responsible for approximately 20-25% of all trauma-related deaths [2,4,7]. Although traffic accidents are the most common cause of blunt thoracic trauma, it can also be seen due to situations such as beating, falling, and crushing [8].

The most common finding in thoracic traumas is rib fractures and the most common 4-9. It is seen in the ribs [5,7,9-11]. Fractures of the ribs are very common in clinical practice and although most of them have limited clinical significance [12], respiratory functions can sometimes be adversely affected [13]. More than half of rib fractures caused by blunt trauma are uncomplicated and only healed with analgesic therapy [14]. In rib fractures that cause complications, treatment is performed for the cause. While the overall mortality is reported as 9% in thoracic traumas, this rate increases to 13-15% if there is a co-system injury, and up to 30-35% if there is more system injury [11]. The most common finding in thoracic traumas is rib fractures and is most commonly seen in the 4th-9th ribs [5,7,9- 11]. Fractures of the ribs are very common in clinical practice and although most of them have limited clinical significance [12], respiratory functions can sometimes be adversely affected [13]. More than half of rib fractures caused by blunt trauma are uncomplicated and only healed with analgesic therapy [14]. In rib fractures that cause complications, treatment is performed for the cause. While the overall mortality is reported as 9% in thoracic traumas, this rate increases to 13-15% if there is a cosystem injury, and up to 30-35% if there is more system injury [11].

Along with rib fractures, vertebral fractures are usually seen as a result of high-energy blunt trauma [15]. Thoracic traumas are accompanied by vertebral fractures at a rate of 6%. The most affected area in vertebral column traumas is the thoracic vertebra. The most important reason is that the longest part of the vertebral column consists of thoracic vertebra [11]. Neurological damage and morbidity are higher in fractures of this region compared to vertebral fractures in other regions [15]. Its causes are narrow spinal canal in the thoracic region, less distance between the spinal cord and bone parts, and more limited blood flow to the spinal cord in this region [16]. Conservative treatment is preferred in cases where there is no neurological deficit and the spine is stable in vertebral fractures in the thoracic region [17]. However, there are indications for surgical treatment in fractures with severe loss of vertebral body height with canal compression, neurological deficit and kyphotic deformity [17,18]. The main purpose of surgical treatment is to protect or improve the neurological status, to provide stability, to correct the deformity, and to prepare the ground for early rehabilitation [17,19].

Methods

Approval was obtained from Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Clinical Research Ethics Committee with the date and number of 2022/3. The files of 250 patients who had trauma between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Conditions that increase co-morbidity such as osteoporosis and malignancy were excluded from the study.

The patients with vertebral fractures and/or rib fractures were identified by examining the thoracic computed tomography scans of the patients. 100 patients with traumatic rib fracture and/or thoracic vertebral fracture were included in the study. The level of rib fractures, displaced or non-displaced conditions were detected in the thoracic computed tomography. The levels and types of fractures (corpus fracture, transverse and spinous process fractures) in patients with thoracic vertebral fractures were determined. The relationship between vertebral fractures and rib fractures was examined.

Statistical Analysis

Chi-square analysis was used to determine whether the cases of complete fractures or cracks in the patients changed depending on the age and gender variable. Statistical analyzes were made using the "IBM SPSS Statistics 26" program. Descriptive statistics for all variables and chi-square analysis were used for evaluation. All results were considered statistically significant with p<0.05 values.

Results

100 patients with rib fracture and/or thoracic vertebra fracture were included in this study. Of the patients, 72% were male and 28% were female. The mean age in men was 45.5 ± 17.92 years, in women the mean age was 56.18 ± 19.26, and the mean overall age was 48.49 ± 18.83 (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographic features.
Variables
Frequency
Mean
Standard Deviation
Sex
Male
72
45.5
17.92
Female
28
56.18
19.26
Age
30 and below
27
-
-
31-44
13
-
18.83
45-56
19
48.49
-
57-70
25
-
-
71 and above
16
-
-
Total
100
-
-

When the fracture levels, corpus fracture, transverse and spinous fractures in patients with thoracic vertebral fractures were examined; the fracture rate in corpus was found to be high between T3 and T9. It was observed that the most corpus fractures were in T8 with 22 patients. Corpus fracture was detected in T1 with at least 1 patient. The fracture rate is generally low in spinous process. The highest fracture rate was in the T2 spinous process with 9 patients. Spinous fracture is the least common place in T5, T6 and T12 with 1 patient each. Transverse processes fracture was seen in T9 with a maximum of 5 patients. T1 and T2 transverse process fractures were not detected (Table 2).

Table 2: Fracture levels of thoracic vertebrae in patients.
 
Trauma
Frequency
Percent
T1 corpus
None
99
99
Displaced
1
1
T1 spinous process
None
97
97
Displaced
3
3
T1 tranverse process
None
100
100
T2 corpus
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T2 spinous process
None
91
91
Displaced
9
9
T2 tranverse process
None
100
100
T3 corpus
None
90
90
Displaced
10
10
T3 spinous process
None
93
93
Displaced
7
7
T3 tranverse process
None
99
99
Displaced
1
1
T4 corpus
None
79
79
Displaced
21
21
T4 spinous process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T4 tranverse process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T5 corpus
None
84
84
Displaced
16
16
T5 spinous process
None
99
99
Displaced
1
1
T5 tranverse process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T6 corpus
None
88
88
Displaced
12
12
T6 spinous process
None
99
99
Displaced
1
1
T6 tranverse process
None
96
96
Displaced
4
4
T7 corpus
None
83
83
Displaced
17
17
T7 spinous process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T7 tranverse process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T8 corpus
None
78
78
Displaced
22
22
T8 spinous process
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
T8 tranverse process
None
96
96
Displaced
4
4
T9 corpus
None
84
84
Displaced
16
16
T9 spinous process
None
97
97
Displaced
3
3
T9 tranverse process
None
95
95
Displaced
5
5
T10 corpus
None
90
90
Displaced
10
10
T10 spinous process
None
95
95
Displaced
5
5
T10 tranverse process
None
96
96
Displaced
4
4
T11 corpus
None
87
87
Displaced
13
13
T11 spinous process
None
97
97
Displaced
3
3
T11 tranverse process
None
96
96
Displaced
4
4
T12 corpus
None
81
81
Displaced
19
19
T12 spinous process
None
99
99
Displaced
1
1
T12 tranverse process
None
97
97
Displaced
3
3
 
Total
100
100

When the fracture levels in patients with right rib fracture were examined; it was observed that the rate of displaced fracture was higher in the right 6th and 7th ribs with 8 patients each. Non-displaced fractures were found to be higher between the 4-11 ribs on the right. 9 patients had the highest rate of non-displaced fracture in the right 5th rib, While non-displaced and displaced fractures were observed in at least the 1st rib in 6 patients, no fractures were found in the 12th ribs (Table 3) (Figure 1).

Table 3: Rib fracture levels of the patients
Ribs
Trauma
Frequency
Percent
Right 1
None
94
94
Non-Displaced
2
2
Displaced
4
4
Right 2
None
97
97
Non-Displaced
1
1
Displaced
2
2
Right 3
None
96
96
Non-Displaced
1
1
Displaced
3
3
Right 4
None
93
93
Non-Displaced
4
4
Displaced
3
3
Right 5
None
84
84
Non-Displaced
9
9
Displaced
7
7
Right 6
None
86
86
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
8
8
Right 7
None
86
86
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
8
8
Right 8
None
91
91
Non-Displaced
3
3
Displaced
6
6
Right 9
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
2
2
Right 10
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
2
2
Right 11
None
93
93
Non-Displaced
5
5
Displaced
2
2
Right 12
None
98
98
Displaced
2
2
Left 1
None
95
95
Non-Displaced
4
4
Displaced
1
1
Left 2
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
7
7
Displaced
1
1
Left 3
None
94
94
Non-Displaced
5
5
Displaced
5
5
Left 4
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
5
5
Displaced
3
3
Left 5
None
86
86
Non-Displaced
8
8
Displaced
6
6
Left 6
None
91
91
Non-Displaced
7
7
Displaced
2
2
Left 7
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
2
2
Left 8
None
91
91
Non-Displaced
5
5
Displaced
4
4
Left 9
None
92
92
Non-Displaced
6
6
Displaced
2
2
Left 10
None
96
96
Non-Displaced
3
3
Displaced
1
1
Left 11
None
97
97
Non-Displaced
3
3
Left 12
None
100
100
 
Total
100
100
Figure 1: Computed tomography images of vertebra and rib fractures.

When the fracture levels in patients with left rib fracture were examined; it was observed that the rate of displacement fracture was highest in the left 5th rib with 6 patients. It was determined that the rate of non-displaced fractures between the left 3 and 9 was high. The most common rib fractures were observed in the 5th rib with 6 displaced patients and 8 nondisplaced patients, while the least were detected in the 10th rib in 4 patients. While no displaced or non-displaced fracture was observed in the 12th rib, no displaced fracture was observed in the 11th rib (Table 3) (Figure 1).

When examining whether the fracture levels, corpus fracture, transverse and spinous fracture status of patients with thoracic vertebral fractures change depending on the age variable; A correlation was found between the fractures in T2 spinous, T3 spinous, T5 corpus and T8 vertebral corpus and the age variable (p<0.05). No significant correlation was found between the fracture levels and the age variable in patients with other thoracic vertebral fractures (p>0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4: Rib fracture levels of the patients.
 
T2 spinous process
Total Chi-Square Tests
None
Displaced
  0.038*
Age
30 and below
26
1
27
31-44
13
0
13
45-56
14
5
19
57-70
24
1
25
71 and above
14
2
16
Total
91
9
100
 
T5 corpus
Total
Chi-Square Tests
None
Displaced
Age
30 and below
20
7
27
0.039*
31-44
11
1
12
45-56
13
6
19
57-70
23
2
25
71 and above
16
0
16
Total
83
16
99
 
T8 corpus
Total Chi-Square Tests
None
Displaced
Age
30 and below
24
3
27 0.011*
31-44
7
6
13
45-56
11
8
19
57-70
22
3
25
71 and above
14
2
16
Total
78
22
100

When examining whether the cases of fractures or cracks in the right and left ribs change depending on the age variable; It was understood that the fractures in the right 4,6,8 and 10 and left 2 and 4 differed depending on the age variable (p<0.05). No significant relationship was found between the other ribs and the age variable (p>0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5: Relationship between right and left rib fracture levels and age variable.
 
Right 8
Total Chi-Square Tests (p value)
None Non-Displaced Displaced
Age 30 and below
26
1
0
27
0.021*
31-44
10
0
3
13
45-56
18
1
0
19
57-70
25
0
0
25
71 and above
12
1
0
16
Total
91
3
6
100
 
Right 10
Total
Chi-Square Tests (p value)
None
Non-Displaced
Displaced
Age 30 and below
27
0
0
27
0.021*
31-44
11
0
2
13
45-56
17
2
0
19
57-70
23
2
0
25
71 and above
14
2
0
16
Total
92
6
2
100
 
Left 2
Total
Chi-Square Tests (p value)
None
Non-Displaced
Displaced
Age
30 and below
27
0
0
27
0.015*
31-44
13
0
0
13
45-56
13
5
1
19
57-70
24
1
0
25
71 and above
15
1
0
16
Total
92
7
1
100
 
Left 4
Total
Chi-Square Tests (p value)
None
Non-Displaced
Displaced
Age
30 and below
27
0
0
27
0.008*
31-44
13
0
0
13
45-56
13
4
2
19
57-70
25
0
0
25
71 and above
14
1
1
16
Total
92
5
3
100

When the relationship between vertebral fracture and gender variable is examined; T7 only a significant relationship was found between the corpus vertebral and the gender variable (p<0.05). In this table 6, only 1 fracture in the T7 corpus was observed in women, while 16 fractures were detected in men. No significant relationship was found between other thoracic vertebral and gender variables (p>0.05) (Table 6).

Table 6: The relationship between rib fracture levels, thoracic vertebral fracture levels and gender variable
Left 6th Rib
None
Non-Displaced
Displaced
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Sex Male
68
2
2
72
0.022
Female
23
5
0
28
Total
91
7
2
100
T7 vertebral corpus
None
Displaced
Chi-Square Tests
Sex Male
56
16
72
72
0.019
Female
27
1
28
   
83
17
100

When the relationship between rib fracture and gender variable is examined; only a significant relationship was found between the left 6th rib and the gender variable (p<0.05). In this table, only cracks were observed in the left 6th rib in women, while both cracks and fractures were detected in men. No significant relationship was found between the other right and left ribs and the gender variable (p>0.05) (Table 6).

Discussion

Cobanoglu, et al. in their study, they found that chest traumas were more common in males and between the 2nd and 5th decades [20]. Wang XR, et al. of 263 patients with vertebral fractures found that the mean age was 42.11 ± 9.82 years and it was more common in males [21]. Varlik M, et al. they found that 69.7% of the patients who had thoracic trauma were male and the mean age was 38 years [22]. Saricam M, et al. in their study of 195 patients, they found that 20% of the patients were women and 80% were men. They found the age range to be 3-93/year with an average of 40.2 years. They reported that the most common thoracic pathology was rib fractures [2].

Rakip U, et al. in their study of 148 men and 104 women, a total of 252 patients, they reported that thorax traumas were more common in men [17].

In our study, 72% of the patients were male and 28% were female, mean age in men was 45.5 ± 17.92, mean age in women was 56.18 ± 19.26, mean overall age was 48.49 ± 18.83.

In the study of İmamoğlu, et al. the incidence of rib fractures due to trauma was found to be 36.4% [23]. However, in different studies, the incidence of rib fractures due to general body trauma was reported to be between 7-40%, and rib fractures due to isolated thoracic trauma were reported to be between 6-12% [24].

In our study, different levels of vertebral fracture and/or rib fracture were detected in 100 (40%) of 250 patients who had general body trauma.

Wang XR, et al. found the frequency order of trauma-related vertebral fractures to be L1, followed by T12 and L2 fractures [21]. In another study, Göya C, et al. stated that 6% of the thoracic traumas were accompanied by vertebral fractures, and they found that the most common fracture site was the thoracic vertebra [12]. Büyükkarabacak YB, et al. determined that 6% of thoracic traumas were accompanied by vertebral fractures. They found the most common thoracic fracture [11]. Ayaz UY, et al. found that 86.7% of the patients with vertebral fractures were in the lumbar vertebra and 13.3% were in the thoracic vertebra [25]. Varlik M, et al. In their study on 1338 patients who had thoracic trauma, they found rib fracture in 29 (2.2%) and vertebral fracture in 56 (4.2%) [22]. Wang XR, et al. L1 fracture in his study; found 25.3% in men and 36.5% in women. They found T12 fracture in 17.7% in men and 19.2% in women. L2 fracture; found 14.6% for men and 10.6% for women [21]. Ulrich J, et al. evaluated 35 articles on vertebral differences, and found that the most common fracture sites were T11/T12 thoracic vertebra and L1/L2 lumbar vertebra [26]. Dumanli A, et al. in their study on 201 cases, they found that rib fractures were more common on the right side, displaced fractures were seen more frequently, and most frequently between the ribs of 48.3% and 5-8%, nondisplaced fractures were the least and most common in 20.4% [9-12] reported that it was between the ribs [5].

In our study, vertebral fractures were most common at the T8 level in 22 patients in the corpus region. It was at least at T1 level and was present in 1 patient. Transverse process fracture was most common in T9 and was present in 5 patients. No transverse process fracture was observed in T1 and T2.

Spinous process fractures were observed most frequently at T2 level and were present in 9 patients, while they were observed at least at T5 and T6 levels and were observed in 1 patient each.

Displaced rib fractures were most common in the 6th and 7th ribs and were observed in 8 patients each. On the left, it was seen in the 5th rib and in 6 patients. Non-displaced rib fractures were most common in the 5th rib on the right and in 9 patients, and on the left in the 5th rib and in 8 patients. Displaced rib fractures were seen in at least 2,9,10,11 and 12 ribs on the right and were present in 2 patients each. 1,2,3,10 ribs, 1 patient each on the left. No fracture was observed in the 12th rib. At least non-displaced fractures were seen in the 1st rib and 1 patient on the right, and in the 10th and 11th ribs and 3 patients on the left, but no non-displaced fractures were observed in the left 12th rib. When evaluated in general, vertebral fractures were most common at T8 level, and rib fractures were most common in the right side and 5th rib.

According to Leblebici HI, et al. in their study on 302 cases (263 men, 39 women), they found the frequency of multiple rib fractures to be 21.5% [27].

In 100 patients included in the study, rib fractures were most common on the right side and in the 5th and 9th ribs.

T7 only in patients with vertebral fracture. A significant relationship was found between the corpus vertebral and the gender variable (p<0.05). In the T7 corpus, only 1 fracture was seen in women, while 16 fractures were detected in men. The difference appears to be due to men.

In rib fractures, only a significant correlation was found between left 6th rib fracture and gender (p<0.05). In the left 6th rib, only non-displaced fracture was observed in women, while both non-displaced and displacement fractures were detected in men.

T2 and T3 spinous, T5 and T8 corpus fractures in patients with vertebral fracture were found to differ depending on the age variable and were statistically significant (p<0.05). In general, it was understood that this relationship was most common in patients aged 45-56 years and patients aged 30 years and younger.

T2 and T3 spinous, T5 and T8 corpus fractures in patients with vertebral fractures were found to differ depending on the age variable and were statistically significant (p<0.05). In general, it was understood that this relationship was most common in patients aged 45-56 years and patients aged 30 years and younger. T2 and T3 spinous, T5 and T8 corpus fractures in patients with vertebral fractures were found to differ depending on the age variable and were statistically significant (p<0.05).

It was determined that right 4,6,8,10 and left 2nd and 4th rib fractures in patients with rib fractures differed depending on the age variable and were statistically significant (p<0.05).

It was understood that this difference was caused by patients aged 71 years and older in the right 4th, 6th and 8 ribs, and in patients aged 31-44 years in the right 10th rib. In the left 2nd and 4th ribs, it was understood that it was caused by patients aged 45-56 years and patients aged 71 years and older.

Conclusion

Rib and vertebral fractures are common conditions that can cause mortality and morbidity and are secondary to trauma. It should be remembered that vertebral fractures may be common in patients due to trauma and may be accompanied by rib fractures. This coexistence should be taken into consideration in the planning of the diagnosis and treatment of patients.

Ethic approval

The study was performed under a protocol approved by the Afyon Kocatepe University Medical Ethic Committee (2022/3).

Conflict of Interest

The autors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Funding

None.

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally.

References

  1. Demirci Ş, Günaydın G, Arıbaş OK. Penetran göğüs travmalarına bağlı ölümler. Genel Tıp Dergisi. 2000;10(2): 63-69.
  2. Sarıçam M, Metin B, Kaya S, et al. Toraks travmalı 195 olgunun retrospektif değerlendirilmesi. Bozok Tıp Derg. 2013;1: 9-14.
  3. Ceran S, Sunam GS, Arıbas OK, et al. Chest trauma in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21: 57-59.
  4. Tülüce K, Altuntaş G. Travmatik Pnömotorakslı 127 Hastanın Değerlendirilmesi: Tek Merkez Deneyimi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2020;10(4): 655-660.
  5. Dumanlı A, Gencer A, Kaya F, et al. Analysıs of Patıents with Blunt Thorax Trauma and Rib Fracture; Evaluatıon of 201 Cases. Turk J Health Sci Life. 2020;3(1): 1-5.
  6. Haberal MA, Köksal E, Civan M, et al. Traumatic hemothorax: Analysis of 108 cases. J Exp Clin Med. 2013;30: 31-33.
  7. Dumanlı A. Künt Toraks Travması Geçiren Hastalarda Oluşan Akciğer Kontüzyonu İle Hemotoraks/Pnömotoraks Arasındaki İlişki. Kocatepe Med J. 2020;21: 217-221.
  8. Serin Hİ, Erkoç MF. Toraks travmalı Erişkin Hastalardaki Kot fraktürü ve Hemopnömotoraks Arasındaki Korelasyon. Bozok Tıp Derg. 2018;(8)3: 83-86.
  9. Hasbahçeci M, Özpek A, Başak F, et al. Künt toraks travmasında mortaliteye etki eden faktörler. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(2): 127-132.
  10. Apilioğulları B, Esme H, Ceran S, et al. Retrospektive analysis of 48 cases with thoracic trauma. Anatol J Med Sci. 2015;1(1): 14-18.
  11. Büyükkarabacak YB, Şengül AT, Gürz S, et al. Toraks Travmalı Hastalarda Yandaş Travmalar: Mortalite Ve Morbidite Üzerine Etkileri. BSJ Health Sci. 2019;2(3): 78-84.
  12. Göya C, Hamidi C. Torasik Travma. Trd Sem. 2016;4: 272-285. 13. Aydın S, Dumanli A, Gencer A. Evaluation of Rib Fractures due to Trauma. Curr J App Sci Technol. 2021;40(7): 46-50.
  13. Bakılan F, Yüce G, Biçen AÇ, et al. Kaburga Kırıklarının Değerlendirilmesinde Ultrasonografinin Yeri. Turk J Osteoporos. 2015;21: 109-112.
  14. Yücetaş ŞC, Oktay K, Çakır T, et al. Torakal (T3-T10) Vertebra Kırıklarına Yaklaşım. Türk Nöroşir Derg. 2020;30(3): 418-427.
  15. Cook E, Booth A, Coleman E, et al. Pragmatic randomised evaluation of stable thoracolumbar fracture treatment outcomes (PRESTO): Study protocol for a randomised controlled feasebility trial combined with a qualitative study and survey. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6: 38.
  16. Rakip U, Yildizhan S, Boyaci MG, et al. Morphometric measurements in thoracal vertebral fractures. Med Sci. 2021;10(1): 92-97.
  17. Koç RK. Torakolomber travmalarda cerrahi tedavi. In: Hanci M,Çağli S (ed), Omurga ve Omurilik Yaralanmaları. TND yayınları 1997; 133-144.
  18. Islam C, Güzel MB, Sakul BU. Clinical importance of the minimal cancellous diameter of lower thoracic and lumbar vertebral pedicles. Clin Anat. 1996;9: 151–154.
  19. Çobanoğlu U, Yalçınkaya İ. Toraks yaralanmaları. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010;16(1): 77-83.
  20. Wang XR, Xu FR, Huang QL, et al. Radiological features of traumatic vertebral endplate fracture: an analysis of 194 cases with 263 vertebral fractures. Chin Med J. 2020;133(22): 2696– 2702.
  21. Varlık M, Eroğlu SE, Özdemir S, et al. Araç İçi Trafik Kazası ile Acil Servisine Başvuran Hastaların Değerlendirilmesi. Fırat Tıp Dergisi/Firat Med J. 2019;24(4): 186-192.
  22. İmamoğlu OU, Öncel M, Erginel T, et al. Toraks travmalarında yaklaşım:110 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Tgkdc Dergis. 1999;7(2): 450-453.
  23. Sirmali M, Türüt H, Topçu S, et al. A comprehensive analy¬sis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24(1): 133-138.
  24. Ayaz ÜY, Tüzün M, Ayaz S, et al. Computed Tomography Findings in Traumatic Fractures of Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebra. J Clin Anal Med. 2016;7(6): 844-847.
  25. Ulrich JS, Fischer K, Schmidt J, et al. The Conservative Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115: 697–704.
  26. Leblebici Hİ, Kaya Y, Koçak AH. Göğüs travmalı 302 olgunun analizi. Tgkdc Dergis. 2005;13(2): 392-396.
PDF    
10.52916/jmrs224086
Quick Links
ARTICLE STATISTICS
  • Submission to First Decision 19 Days
  • Acceptance Rate 60%
  • Acceptance to Publication 6-8 Days
  • *Average article statistics from the last 12 months data
Journal of Medical Research and Surgery, Bimonthly, ISSN 2582-9572, published by Respub Journals.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). With this license readers can share, distribute, and download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited.
This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, in Scholarly Publishing.
This website: http://respubjournals.com/medical-research-surgery/ editorial contact: editor.jmrs@respubjournals.com
Address: #999, Sector-31, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Stay Always In Touch

Ⓒ Copyright 2022. All Rights Reserved by Respub Journals