Cutting-Edge Innovations in Minimally Invasive Techniques for Skin Cancer Treatment

Elahe Najafizadeh, Ahmad Alkhateeb^*, Regina Mankovskaia
Department of Dermatology and Cosmetology, Bashkir State Medical University, Russia.

Correspondence to: Ahmad Alkhateeb, Department of Dermatology and Cosmetology, Bashkir State Medical University, Russia.
Received date: February 17, 2024; Accepted date: March 7, 2024; Published date: March 14, 2024
Citation: Najafizadeh E, Alkhateeb A, Mankovskaia R. Cutting-Edge Innovations in Minimally Invasive Techniques for Skin Cancer Treatment J Med Res Surg. 2024;5(2):29-39. doi: 10.52916/jmrs244133
Copyright: ©2024 Najafizadeh E, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Skin cancer is a common and possibly deadly disease that requires immediate and efficient treatment. Conventional surgical methods, although successful, frequently lead to the formation of scars and extended periods of recuperation. In recent years, there have been significant developments in minimally invasive treatments for treating skin cancer. These techniques provide patients with alternative options that result in better cosmetic outcomes and shorter recovery periods. This article is a comprehensive summary of state-of-the-art advancements in minimally invasive procedures, including as laser therapy, cryotherapy, electrochemotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation. We analyze the benefits of these procedures, including minimized scarring, improved cosmetic outcomes, and faster healing periods, while also examining the difficulties and factors involved in their application. We showcase the concrete advantages that patients receive when they undergo minimally invasive therapy for skin cancer, using case studies and success stories as evidence. In addition, we examine potential future paths in research and development, anticipating a favorable outlook for the ongoing use of minimally invasive methods in the treatment of skin cancer.
The global prevalence of skin cancer is a substantial health issue, leading to continuous progress in treatment strategies aimed at enhancing patient results. Conventional surgical techniques, however efficient, can lead to conspicuous scarring and extended recuperation periods. Recent advancements in minimally invasive procedures have significantly transformed the treatment of skin cancer, providing patients with alternative options that yield better esthetic results and shorter recovery periods. This article offers a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art advancements in minimally invasive procedures, encompassing laser therapy, cryotherapy, electrochemotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation. We use case studies and success stories to demonstrate the concrete advantages that patients gain from these operations, such as minimized scarring and improved cosmetic outcomes. In addition, we explore the difficulties and factors to take into account when putting these methods into practice, along with potential areas for further investigation and advancement. Our goal is to emphasize the hopeful future of minimally invasive treatments in skin cancer care, which will ultimately enhance patient experiences and outcomes.

Keywords:

Skin cancer, Surgery, Cryotherapy, Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), Surgical procedure, Tumor.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

1. Rossi AM, Nehal KS. Update on Non-invasive Imaging Techniques in Dermatology. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38(4):429-436.
2. Morton C, Horn M, Leman J. Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Skin Cancer: A Review of the Current Literature. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(3):367-374.
3. Asghari A, Alipour M, Rahimi H, et al. Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy in treatment of cutaneous malignancies: a systematic review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;34:102280.
4. Serra-Guillén C, Nagore E, Hueso L, et al. Update on the Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2020;111(8):645-653.
5. Gualdi G, Kolios AGA, Khoury F, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Primer. Dermatol Ther. 2021;11(2):579-591.
6. Vohra NA, Karagas MR, Duncan LM, et al. Minimally invasive detection of melanoma and other skin cancers using optical coherence tomography and two-photon absorption microscopy. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(1):99-107.
7. Carrascosa JM, Muñoz E, Girón P, et al. Melanoma and cutaneous neoplasms: imaging diagnosis. Part 1: dermatoscopic evaluation and monitoring of melanocytic lesions. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104(6):436-451.
8. Siegel JA, Korgavkar K, Weinstock MA. Current perspective on actinic keratosis: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(2):350-358.
9. Park K, Karia PS, Schmults CD. Quality of life and facial skin cancer: A pictorial review. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(2):147-156.
10. Fujisawa Y, Otomo Y, Ogata D, et al. Usefulness of reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma using unscratched tissue sections. J Dermatol. 2021;48(7):923-930.
11. Tolkachjov SN, Helm KF. Utilization of reflectance confocal microscopy in the management of nonmelanoma skin cancers. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(9):1203-1209.
12. Situm M, Buljan M, Dediol I, et al. Photodynamic therapy in non-melanoma skin cancer treatment - our experience. Coll Antropol. 2021;45(1):1-6.
13. Grzechocińska B, Smolińska E, Łabuz P, et al. Photodynamic therapy in nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment in the elderly. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;34:102290.
14. Berroeta L, Del Marmol V, Richert B. Update on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(4):560-566.
15. Ballester-Sánchez R, Suelves AM, Escámez MJ, et al. Intralesional electrochemotherapy with bleomycin in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(3):e14986.
16. Ahmed M, Haq K, Najmi Y, et al. Minimally invasive therapies for primary non-melanoma skin cancer of the face: A systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(9):2935-2942.
17. Facundo EP, Prieto-Torres L, Miranda-Perales R, et al. Use of confocal microscopy and 3D printed molds for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;37:102668.
18. Nucci NP, Cinotti E, Tognetti L, et al. Efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of cutaneous malignancies: a prospective study. Skin Res Technol. 2021;27(4):584-588.
19. Ebrahimi A, Khalili N, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Quality of life in patients with skin cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32(5):533-540.
20. Hong SB, Kang MJ, Cho S, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy as an adjunct to Mohs micrographic surgery for high-risk nonmelanoma skin cancers: a retrospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(3):574-582.
21. Yang T, Xiao X, Zhang J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ablative fractional CO2 laser and ablative radiofrequency in treating superficial basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(6):e15117.
22. Nucci NP, Tognetti L, Cinotti E, et al. In vivo microinvasive basal cell carcinoma: High-frequency ultrasound evaluation. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(6):e15176.
23. Guan Y, Zhang J, Zhou Y, et al. Exosome-mimetic nanoparticles loaded with hydrogen sulfide alleviate skin inflammation and accelerate wound healing through regulating keratinocytes. Acta Biomater. 2021;134:112-122.
24. López-Páez JA, Torrano V, Morales A, et al. Squalene-based nanoparticles for programmed delivery of anticancer agents. Acta Biomater. 2021;130:100-115.
25. Neugebauer S, Krüger S, Baier M, et al. Skin Cancer Research in Dermatology and Oncology: Perspective of the Working Group Dermatological Oncology (ADO) of the German Dermatological Society (DDG). J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1626.
26. Calvo-Lozano O, Alberdi P, Alesanco Á. Mobile Health Technologies for Skin Cancer Detection: A Review. J Med Syst. 2021;45(9):77.
27. Esposito A, Moscarella E, Cinotti E, et al. Characterization of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by means of reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography: a pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(11):e728-e730.
28. Long C, Wu J, Liu M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of ablative fractional CO2 laser and ablative radiofrequency in treating superficial basal cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;36:102669.
29. Rajpara SM, Doshi BR, Purohit MB, et al. Role of reflectance confocal microscopy in clinical practice: A cross-sectional observational study. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(4):e2021140.
30. Ryu HS, Choi YD, Suh IS. Randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical excision in treating basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(12):e829-e830.
31. Silverman C, Awal S, Nicholas M, et al. Efficacy of Intralesional Electrochemotherapy in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(9):1255-1261.