Oncology: Tumor & Research

Krukenberg Tumor: A Review of Prognostic Factors and Management

Mayra Vallina Bocanegra1, Ana Carolina Ortiz Sanchez1, Julio Alberto Vásquez1, Natalia Gabriela Sanchez1, Adrian Murillo Zolezzi2*
1Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Mexico;
2Profesor of surgery at Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Mexico

Correspondence to: Adrian Murillo Zolezzi, Profesor of Surgery at Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Mexico; E-mail: dradrianmurillo@ itesm.mx
Received date: September 28, 2020; Accepted date: October 10, 2020; Published date: October 17, 2020
Citation: Bocanegra MV, Ortiz Sanchez AC, Vásquez JA, et al. (2020) Krukenberg Tumor: A Review of Prognostic Factors and Management. Onco Tum Res 1(1): pp. 1-4. doi: 10.52916/otr204003
Copyright: ©2020 Bocanegra MV, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Aim: This review aims to summarize current evidence on Krukenberg Tumors (KT), addressing the main prognostic determinants and its’ management.

Background: Krukenberg Tumors are rare metastatic tumors of the ovary. They were initially described by Friederich Ernst Krukenberg in 1896. They arise from extra-ovarian primary signet-ring cell carcinomas, being the gastrointestinal tract the most common site of origin. The most common clinical presentation of KT is an abdominal mass or discomfort in a premenopausal 40 to the 50-year-old woman. The prognosis is extremely poor compared to primary ovarian cancer.

Results: Overall survival may vary significantly according to the choice and timing of treatment. The effective treatment strategies for KT are still controversial. However, therapeutic options include surgical resection as the mainstay of treatment when possible and the application of different Chemotherapy (CT) regimens. Conclusions: Several factors negatively affect prognosis: an incomplete metastasectomy, extensive disease at diagnosis and the origin of the tumor are the main factors that most authors agree incur in a worse prognosis. KT’s optimal therapeutic strategies are still a matter of debate, raising the need for more studies to achieve consensus.

Keywords:

Krukenberg Tumor, Prognostic factors, Management, Colorectal cancer, Gastric cancer

PDF    Google Scholar    
10.52916/otr204003

Related Highlights

  • Cellular Oncology 
  • Clinical Oncology 
  • Comparative Oncology 
  • Dental Oncology 
  • Genitourinary Oncology
  • Interventional Oncology
  • Molecular Oncology 
  • Musculoskeletal Oncology 
  • Oncology Analytics 
  • Oncology Emergency 
  • Oncology Esthetics 
  • Oncology Nutrition 
  • Radio Oncology
  • Thoracic Oncology  
  • Veterinary Oncology
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Blood Cancer
  • Brain Cancer
  • Breast Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Colon Cancer
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Liver Cancer
  • Lung Cancer
  • Metastatic Breast Cancer
  • Oesophagal Cancer
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Skin Cancer

Related Journals


Respub Journals an online international open access organization which publishes all kinds of peer reviewed articles in the journals. Respub Journals focus into the fields of Clinical and Medical.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). With this license readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited.

Stay Always In Touch

Ⓒ Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved by Respub Journals