Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecological Surgery A PLATFORM FOR SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY IN THE FIELD OF OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGY FIELD

Community Based Study of Awareness of Maternity Dangers Amongst Rural, Tribal Preconception and Pregnant Women

PDF    Google Scholar    
10.52916/jogs214013

Shakunthala Chhabra*
Department of Obstetrics Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Insitute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

*Correspondence to: Shakunthala Chhabra Department of Obstetrics Gynaecology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India; E-mail: chhabra_s@rediffmail.com
Received date: June 7, 2021; Accepted date: June 20, 2021; Published date: June 27, 2021
Citation: Chhabra S (2021) Community Based Study of Awareness of Maternity Dangers Amongst Rural, Tribal Preconception and Pregnant Women. J Obst Gynecol Surg 2(1): pp. 1-8. doi: 10.52916/jogs214013
Copyright: ©2021 Chhabra S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: Every pregnant woman faces risk of complications which can cause severe illness or even death of mother and /or baby. Creating awareness about maternity dangers is crucial for safe birth, safe future of mother and baby. Although it remains unclear how awareness translates into appropriate actions, chances of better outcome are there.

Objectives: Community based study was carried out to know about rural, tribal preconception and pregnant women’s awareness and perceptions of maternity dangers.

Material and Methods: After approval of institute’s ethics committee, study was conducted in tribal communities of 100 villages of hilly forestry region, where mother child services were initiated after creating health facility in one village. Randomly minimum 20 and 10 preconception, pregnant women each, from every village, total 2400 preconception, 1040 pregnant women of 15 to 45 years age were interviewed by research assistant with help of pretested tool.

Results: Of 2400 Preconception women interviewed, 801 (33.4%) were aware of labour events, 298 (37.2%) mucoid discharge, 291 (36.3%) little bleeding, 212 (26.5%) labour pains. When asked about source of information, 300 (37.5%) said doctors, 291 (36.3%) Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) and 210 (26.2%) nurse. Of 2400 preconception women, 1015 (42.29%) did talk of some maternity dangers, 403 (39.7%) said swelling over face and feet, 271 (26.7%) giddiness, 184 (18.13%) excessive vomiting and 157 (15.47%) bleeding, leaking with some overlap.

Of 1040 pregnant women, 910 (87.5%) were aware of labour events and 870 (83.7%) some maternity dangers, 474 (54.5%) preterm pains, 118 (13.5%) leaking, 97 (11.1%) epigastric pain, 73 (8.4%) headache, 67 (7.7%) vaginal bleeding and 41 (4.7%) loss of fetal movements with some overlap.

Conclusion: Only one third preconception and little more pregnant women had some awareness of maternity dangers, but it was scatchy.

Keywords:

Preconception, Pregnant women, Maternity Dangers, Awareness

Introduction

Every pregnant woman faces the risk of complications, some not even predictable. They could lead to serious illnesses, death of mother or baby or both [1]. Creating awareness of maternity dangers is crucial for safe birth, safe mother and baby and their safe future. While it remains unclear how awareness translates into recognition of danger signs and also appropriate actions, however awareness about dangers is essential to seek prompt care to avert severe morbidity and mortality [2]. Underestimation of pregnancy-associated health risks could compromise decision-making and reduce demand for service. Women encounter maternity dangers during pregnancy, birth and in postbirth period. It is important, that women and health providers know and prevent serious complications and initiate treatment earliest. Delay in seeking care is one of the key factors leading to maternal deaths, which is associated with lack of awareness about maternity dangers. So, it is essential that preconception and pregnant women are aware of maternity dangers so that they seek timely healthcare [3].

Objectives

Community based study was carried out to know about awareness and perceptions about maternity dangers in rural tribal preconception and pregnant women.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted amongst tribal communities of 100 villages of hilly and forestry region, Melghat of Amravati, Maharashtra, India after taking approval of ethics committee of the institute. Community based mother and child care activities were initiated in these 100 villages, after having created a health facility in one of these villages. Minimum 20 preconception women from each village, making 2400 preconception and minimum 10 pregnant women from each village making 1040 pregnant women of 15 to 45 years included randomly, became the study subjects. Information was collected by interviewing women in the villages through pretested tool using language which women understood with some questions for yes or no answers and others for short answers. Information was collected about awareness regarding maternity dangers amongst preconception and pregnant women.

Results

Of 2400 preconception women interviewed, only 801 (33.4%) knew about the labour events, 298 (37.2%) mucoid discharge, 291 (36.3%) slight bleeding and 212 (26.5%) labour pains with some overlap. When asked about source of information, 300 (37.5%) said doctors, 291 (36.3%) Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) and 210 (26.2%) nurse. Of 2400 study subjects, 828 (34.5%) were of 20-24 years, 314 (37.9%) knew about labour events, 152 (48.4%) mucoid discharge, 97 (30.7%) bleeding, (20.7%) labour pains with some overlap. Sources of information were ASHAs in 174 (55.4%). Total 57 (77%) of 74 preconception women of 40-45 years could tell about labour events. Of 2400 study subjects, only 216 (30.9%) of 699 who worked away from their own villages knew about labour events, 106 (49.1%) said slight bleeding, 62 (28.7%) labour pains and 48 (22.2%) mucoid discharge. In 104 (48.9%) doctors were the source of information. Of 2400 study subjects, 89 women (60.5%) of 147 belonging to upper economic class were aware of labour events and 45 (50.6%) said slight bleeding. In 49 (55.1%) doctors were the source of information. Similarly 275 (31.5%) of 864 women of lower economic class were aware of labour events and 142 (51.6%) did talk of labour pains. In most cases (165 (60%)) ASHAs were the source of information. Of 2400 study subjects, 78 (74.3%) of 105 women who had one child were aware of labour events and 44 (56.4%) said slight bleeding. In 53 (67.9%) ASHAs were the source of information. Similarly 243 (47.9%) of 509 women with 5 or more children were aware of labour events, 81 (33.3%) labour pains, 85 (34.9%) mucoid discharge and 77 (31.7%) slight bleeding. Sources of information were doctors in 109 (44.9%), ASHAs in 104 (42.8%) and nurses in 30 (12.3%).

Of 2400 preconception women, 1015 (42.29%) were aware of some maternity dangers, 403 (39.7%) said swelling over face and feet, 271 (26.7%) giddiness, 184 (18.13%) excessive vomiting and 157 (15.47%) bleeding and leaking with some overlap. Overall awareness was scatchy.

Overall of 1040 pregnant women, 910 (87.5%) were aware of labour events. 319 (98.8%) of 323 of 15 to 19 years, 29 (51.8%) of 56 illiterate, all 66 and 43 (100%) graduate and postgraduate studied, 901 (95.5%) of 943 housewives, 19 (47.5%) of 40 labourer, 91 (77.8%) of 117 women with more than five children were aware of labor events. (Table 1-3).

Table 1: Preconception awareness of labor events.
Variables Age
Total
Awareness
Contents
Source of Awareness
No % YES % Labour Pains
%
Mucal Discharg % Bleeding % Accredited Social Health Activist % Nurse % Doctor %
15-19 336 221 65.8 115 34.2 35 30.4 45 39.1 35 30.4 36 31.3 23 20 56 48.7
20-24 828 514 62.1 314 37.9 65 20.7 152 48.4 97 30.9 174 55.4 65 20.7 75 23.9
25-29 736 542 73.6 194 26.4 74 38.1 33 17.0 87 44.8 57 29.4 62 32.0 75 38.7
30-34 333 264 79.3 69 20.7 17 24.6 31 44.9 21 30.4 18 26.1 45 65.2 6 8.7
35-39 93 41 44.1 52 55.9 9 17.3 11 21.2 32 61.5 6 11.5 11 21.2 35 67.3
45-45 74 17 23.0 57 77.0 12 21.1 26 45.6 19 33.3 0 0.0 4 7.0 53 93.0
Total 2400 1599 66.6 801 33.4 212 26.5 298 37.2 291 36.3 291 36.3 210 26.2 300 37.5
Education  
Llliterate 953 680 71.4 273 28.6 47 17.2 149 54.6 77 28.2 62 22.7 119 43.6 92 33.7
Primary 850 579 68.1 271 31.9 119 43.9 75 27.7 77 28.4 166 61.3 28 10.3 77 27.4
Secondary 506 315 62.3 191 37.7 45 24.1 55 28.8 90 47.1 51 26.7 58 30.4 82 42.9
Higher Secondary 91 25 27.5 66 72.5 0 0.0 19 28.8 47 71.2 12 18.2 5 7.6 49 74.2
Total 2400 1599 66.6 801 33.4 212 26.5 298 37.2 291 36.3 291 36.3 210 26.2 300 37.5
Profession  
Housewife 275 169 61.5 106 38.5 28 26.4 58 54.7 20 18.9 27 25.5 38 35.8 41 38.7
Labourer 958 573 59.8 385 40.2 112 29.1 157 40.8 116 30.1 160 41.6 111 28.8 114 29.6
Own Farm Labourer 468 374 79.9 94 20.1 10 10.6 35 37.2 49 52.1 21 22.3 32 34.0 41 43.6
Work Away From Own Village 699 483 69.1 216 30.9 62 28.7 48 22.2 106 49.1 83 38.4 29 13.4 104 48.1
Total 2400 1599 66.6 801 33.4 212 26.5 298 37.2 291 36.3 291 36.3 210 26.2 300 37.5
Economic Status  
Upper 147 58 39.5 89 60.5 16 18.0 28 31.5 45 50.6 22 24.7 18 20.2 49 55.1
Upper Middle 183 104 56.8 79 43.2 6 7.6 55 69.6 18 22.8 32 40.5 13 16.5 34 43.0
Middle 544 349 64.2 195 35.8 8 4.1 78 40.0 109 55.9 52 26.7 46 23.6 97 49.7
Upper Lower 662 499 75.4 163 24.6 40 24.5 65 39.9 58 35.6 20 12.3 57 35.0 86 52.8
Lower 864 589 68.2 275 31.8 142 51.6 72 26.2 61 22.2 165 60.0 76 27.6 34 12.4
Total 2400 1599 66.6 801 33.4 212 26.5 298 37.2 291 36.3 291 36.3 210 26.2 300 37.5
Parity  
P0 105 27 25.7 78 74.3 15 19.2 19 2.4 44 56.4 53 67.9 12 15.4 13 16.7
P1 411 330 80.3 81 19.7 30 37.0 10 1.2 41 50.6 49 60.5 10 12.3 22 27.2
P2 672 464 69.0 208 31.0 69 33.2 91 4.4 48 23.1 51 24.5 58 27.9 99 47.6
P3 453 322 71.1 131 28.9 5 3.8 57 4.4 69 52.7 20 15.3 77 58.8 34 26.0
P4 250 190 76.0 60 24.0 12 20.0 36 6.0 12 20.0 14 23.3 23 38.3 23 38.3
P5 Above 509 266 52.3 243 47.7 81 33.3 85 3.5 77 31.7 104 42.8 30 12.3 109 44.9
Total 2400 1599 66.6 801 33.4 212 26.5 298 37.2 291 36.3 291 36.3 210 26.2 300 37.5
Table 2: Preconception awareness about maternity dangers.
Varribles Age
Total
Awareness
Maternity Dangers
No % Yes % Excessive Vomiting % Vaginal Blooding /Leaking % Giddiness % Swelling over Face feet %
15-19 336 268 79.76 68 20.24 12 17.65 8 11.76 21 30.9 27 39.7
20-24 828 543 65.58 285 34.42 66 23.16 30 10.53 103 36.1 86 30.2
25-29 736 413 56.11 323 43.89 59 18.27 60 18.58 88 27.2 116 35.9
30-34 333 103

30.93

230 69.07 26 11.30 39 16.96 36 15.7 129 56.1
35-39 93 31 33.33 62 66.67 8 12.90 10 16.13 14 22.6 30 48.4
40-45 74 27 36.49 47 63.51 13 27.66 10 21.28 9 19.1 15 31.9
Total 2400 1385 57.71 1015 42.29 184 18.13 157 15.47 271 26.7 403 39.7
Education  
Llliterate 953 611 64.11 342 35.887 93 27.193 58 16.959 108 31.6 83 24.3
Primary 850 374 44 476 56 56 11.765 43 9.0336 123 25.8 254 53.4
Secondary 506 355 70.16 151 29.842 27 17.881 44 29.139 28 18.5 52 34.4
Higher Secondary 91 45 49.45 45 50.549 8 17.391 12 26.087 12 26.1 14 30.4
Total 2400 1385 57.71 1015 42.29 184 18.13 157 15.47 271 26.7 403 39.7
Profession  
Housewife 275 150 54.55 125 45.455 39 31.2 18 14.4 20 16 48 38.4
Labourer 958 566 59.08 392 40.919 87 22.194 60 15.306 188 48 57 14.5
Own Form Labourer 468 275 58.76 193 41.239 31 16.062 37 19.171 25 13 100 51.8
Work Away Form Our Village 699 394 56.37 305 43.634 27 8.8525 42 13.77 38 12.5 198 64.9
Total 2400 1385 57.71 1015 42.29 184 18.13 157 15.47 271 26.7 403 39.7
Economics Status  
Upper 147 60 40.82 87 59.18 14 16.09 10 11.49 5 5.75 58 66.7
Upper Middle 183 68 37.16 115 62.84 10 8.70 29 25.22 43 37.4 33 28.7
Middle 544 354 65.07 190 34.93 47 24.74 35 18.42 37 19.5 71 37.4
Upper Lower 662 379 57.25 283 42.75 76 26.86 22 7.77 52 18.4 133 47
Lower 864 524 60.65 340 39.35 37 10.88 61 17.94 134 39.4 108 31.8
Total 2400 1385 57.71 1015 42.29 184 18.13 157 15.47 271 26.7 403 39.7
Parity  
P1 516 277 53.7 239 46.32 54 22.6 38 15.9 99 41 48 20
P2 672 368 54.8 304 45.24 42 13.8 51 16.8 130 43 81 27
P3 453 281 62 172 37.97 36 20.9 27 15.7 13 7.6 96 56
P4 250 189 75.6 61 24.4 9 14.8 19 31.1 12 20 21 34
P5 509 270 53 239 46.95 43 18 22 9.21 17 7.1 157 66
Total 2400 1385 57.71 1015 42.29 184 18.13 157 15.47 271 26.7 403 39.7
Table 3: Preconception awareness about maternity dangers.
Variables Age Total Awareness Disorders Action Possible
No % Yes % Anemia % Hypertensio % Iron supplementary medicine % Blood Pressure Record %
15-19 336 135 40.18 201 59.82 127 63.18 74 36.82 116 57.71 85 42.29
20-24 828 422 50.97 406 49.03 210 51.72 196 48.28 157 38.67 249 61.33
25-29 736 420 57.07 316 42.93 143 45.25 173 54.75 145 45.89 171 54.11
30-34 333 223 66.97 110 33.03 51 46.36 59 53.64 38 34.55 72 65.45
35-39 93 34 36.56 59 63.44 9 15.25 50 84.75 18 30.51 41 69.49
40-45 74 15 20.27 59 79.73 18 30.51 41 69.49 10 16.95 49 83.05
Total 2400 1249 52.04 1151 47.96 558 48.48 593 51.52 484 42.05 667 57.95
Education  
Llliterate 953 416 43.65 537 56.35 206 38.36 331 61.64 224 41.71 313 58.29
Primary 850 464 54.59 386 45.41 180 46.63 206 53.37 215 55.7 171 44.3
Secondary 506 234 46.25 272 53.75 141 51.84 131 48.16 50 18.38 222 81.62
Higher Secondary 91 49 53.85 42 46.15 31 73.81 11 26.19 6 14.29 36 85.71
Total 2400 1249 52.04 1151 47.96 558 48.48 593 51.52 484 42.05 667 57.95
Profession  
Housewife 275 201 73.09 74 26.91 33 44.59 41 55.41 30 40.54 44 59.46
Labourer 958 450 46.97 508 53.03 260 51.18 248 48.82 25 4.92 483 95.08
Own Farm Labourer 468 253 54.06 215 45.94 52 24.19 163 75.81 20 9.3 195 90.7
Work Away Form Our Village 699 304 43.49 395 56.51 210 53.16 185 46.84 310 78.48 85 21.52
Total 2400 1249 52.04 1151 47.96 558 48.48 593 51.52 484 42.05 667

57.95

Economics Status  
Upper 147 58 39.46 89 60.54 30 33.71 59 66.29 37 41.57 52 58.43
Upper Middle 183 117 63.93 66 36.07 25 37.88 41 62.12 23 34.85 43 65.15
Middle 544 429 78.86 115 21.14 17 14.78 98 85.22 19 16.52 96 83.48
Upper Lower 662 181 27.34 481 72.66 222 46.15 259 53.85 205 42.62 276 57.38
Lower 864 423 48.96 441 51.04 264 59.86 177 40.14 211 47.85 230 52.15
Total 2400 1249 52.04 1151 47.96 558 48.48 593 51.52 484 42.05 667 57.95
Parity  
P1 516 210 40.7 306 59.3 180 58.82 486 159 105 34.31 201 65.7
P2 672 325 48.36 347 51.6 203 58.5 144 41.5 153 44.09 194 55.9
P3 453 248 54.75 205 45.3 74 36.1 131 63.9 92 44.88 113 55.1
P4 250 81 32.4 169 67.6 57 33.73 112 66.3 74 43.79 95 56.2
P5 Above 509 344 67.58 165 32.4 44 26.67 121 73.3 71 43.03 94 57
Total 2400 1249 52.04 1151 47.96 558 48.48 593 51.52 484 42.05 667 57.95

Overall of 1040 pregnant study subjects, 870 (83.7%) were aware of some maternity dangers, 474 (54.5%) said preterm pains, 118 (13.5%) leaking, 97 (11.1%) epigastric pain, 73 (8.4%) headache, 67 (7.7%) vaginal bleeding and 41 (4.7%) decrease in fetal movements, with some overlap. However awareness was scatchy. Of 1040 women, 536 (51.53%) were of 20-24 years and 416 (77.6%) of them were aware of some maternity dangers, 122 (29.3%) said less fetal movements, 106 (25.5%) vaginal bleeding, 78 (18.8%) preterm pains, 66 (15.9%) leaking, 33 (7.9%) headache and 11 (2.6%) said epigastric pain. Of 1040 women, 56 (5.3%) were illiterate and of them only 15 (26.8%) were aware of some maternity dangers, 11 (73.3%) leaking, 4 (26.7%) headache, 36 (83.7%) of 43 post graduate studied were aware of some dangers, 21 (58.3%) preterm pains, 10 (27.8%) headache and 5 (13.9%) leaking. Of 1040 women, 43 (40.13%) were of upper economic class, 41 (95.3%) of them were aware of some dangers, 31 (75.6%) preterm pains, 6 (14.6%) leaking and 4 (9.8%) headache. Overall 195 (31.6%) of 618 of lower economic class were aware of some maternity dangers, 44 (22.6%) preterm pains, 21 (10.8%) leaking, 12 (6.2%) vaginal bleeding, 12 (6.2%) less fetal movements, 97 (49.7%) headache and 9 (4.6%) epigastric pain.

Of 1040 pregnant women, 943 (90.67%) were housewives and of them, 643 (68.2%) were aware of some maternity dangers, 256 (39.8%) about preterm pains. Of 1040 women, 94 (80.3%) out of 117 with one child were aware of some dangers, 54 (57.4%) preterm pains, 403 (87.4%) of 461 with many children talked of dangers, 209 (51.9%) preterm pains, 66 (16.4%) epigastric pain and 51 (12.7%) vaginal bleeding. In most cases there was some overlap, but even postgraduate studied didn’t talk about heavy vaginal bleeding, during pregnancy, epigastric pain, convulsions, hand or cord prolapse, intra uterine death of baby, rupture uterine, inversion, retained placenta, post-partum hemorrhage etc. (Table 4,5).

Table 4: Pregnant women’s awareness of labour events.
Variables
Total
Awareness
Age
Yes % No %
15 To 19 323 319 98.8 4 1.2
20 To 24 536 504 94 32 6
25 To 29 109 99 90.8 10 9.2
30 To 34 68 62 91.2 6 8.8
35 To 39 4 4 100 0 0
Education  
Illiterate 56 29 51.8 27 48.2
Primary 321 291 85.5 52 14.5
Secondary 358 306 85.5 52 14.5
Higher Secondary 196 195 99.5 1 0.5
Graducate 66 66 100 0 0
Post Graducate 43 43 100 0 0
Economic Status  
Upper 43 43 100 0 0
Upper Middle 51 50 98 1 2
Upper Lower 142 139 97.9 3 2.1
Lower Middle 186 179 96.2 7 3.8
Lower 618 588 95.1 30 4.9
Profession  
Housewife 943 901 95.5 42 4.5
Ownfarm Labour 53 29 54.7 24 45.3
Labourer 40 19 47.5 21 52.5
Otherwork 4 1 25 3 75
Parity  
P.1 117 91 77.8 26 22.2
P.2 103 101 98.1 2 1.9
P.3 155 149 96.1 6 3.9
P.4 204 166 81.4 38 18.6
P.5 Above 461 403 87.4 58 12.6
Total 1040 910 87.5 130 12.5
Table 5: Pregnant women’s awareness of labour events.
Variables Age
Total
Awareness Of Maternity Danger
If Yes Danger Problems
No % Yes % Preterm Pains % Leaking % Vaginal Bleeding % Lessfetal Movements % Headache % Epigastria Pain %
15 To 19 323 218 67.5 105 32.5 16 15.2 51 48.6 2 1.9 1 1.0 20 19.0 15 14.3
20 To 24 536 120 22.4 416 77.6 78 18.8 66 15.9 106 25.5 122 29.3 33 7.9 11 2.5
25 To 29 109 13

11.9

96 88.1 17 17.7 47 49.0 21 21.9 6 6.3 5 5.2 0 0.0
30 To 34 68 42 61.8 26 38.2 1 3.8 19 73.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 23.1 0 0.0
35 To 39 4 0

0.0

4 100 0 0.0 1 25.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.0
Education  
Illiterate 56 41 73.2 15 26.8 0 0.0 11 73.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 26.7 0 0.0
Primary 321 91 28.3 230 71.7 22 9.6 106 46.1 47 20.4 19 8.3 10 4.3 26 11.3
Secondary 358 161 45.0 197 55.0 16 8.1 35 17.8 22 11.2 57 28.9 67 34.0 0 0.0
Higher Secondary 196 63 32.1 133 67.9 1 0.8 21 15.8 5 3.8 2 1.5 79 59.4 25 18.8
Graducate 66 30 45.5 36 54.5 31 86.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 13.9 0 0.0
Post Graducate 43 7 16.3 36 83.7 21 58.3 5 13.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 27.8 0 0.0
Economic status  
Upper 43 2 4.7 41 95.3 31 75.6 6 14.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 9.8 0 0.0
Upper Middle 51 3 5.9 48 94.1 34 70.8 8 16.7 0 0.0 2 4.2 4 8.3 0 0.0
Upper Lower 142 29 20.4 113 79.6 41 36.3 0 0.0 57 50.4 4 3.5 10 8.8 1 0.9
Lower Middle 186 36 19.4 150 80.6 21 14.0 11 7.3 88 58.7 2 1.3 2 1.3 26 17.3
Lower 618 323 52.3 195 31.6 44 22.6 21 10.8 12 6.2 12 6.2 97 49.7 9 4.6
Profession  
Housewife 943 300 31.8 643 68.2 256 39.8 106 16.5 114 17.7 33 5.1 57 8.9 77 12.0
Ownfarm Labour 53 49 92.5 4 7.5 3 75.0 1 15.0 1 2.5 8 20.0 . 7.5 0 0.0
Labourer 40 0 0.0 40 100 22 55.0 6 15.0 1 2.5 8 20.0 3 7.5 0 0.0
Otherwork 4 4 100 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Parity  
P.1 117 23

19.7

94 80.3 54 57.4 12 12.8 3 3.2 8 8.5 4 4.3 13 13.8
P.2 106 6 5.8 97 94.2 59 60.8 21 21.6 0 0.0 2 2.1 12 12.4 3 3.1
P.3 155 38 24.5 117 75.5 71 60.7 14 12.0 1 0.9 2 1.7 25 21.4 4 3.4
P.4 204 45 22.1 159 77.9 81 50.9 38 23.9 12 7.5 8 5.0 9 5.7 11 6.9
P.5 Above 461 58 12.6 403 87.4 209 51.9 33 8.2 51 12.7 21 5.2 23 5.7 66 16.4
Total 1040 170 16.3 870 83.7 474 54.5 118 13.6 67 7.7 41 4.7 73 8.4 97 11.1

Discussion

Maternity related dangers are the major health problems and cause of mortality among women in developing countries. Key dangers during labor, postbirth include, severe bleeding, prolonged labor, obstructed labour, convulsions, retained placenta, loss of consciousness, post-partum bleeding and fever in postpartum period too.

Recognizing maternity complications and action needed should significantly increase the capacity of women, their families, to take appropriate steps to ensure safe birth and to seek timely skilled care to remain healthy. Félix et al. [4] in their study to identify the scores on the pregnant women’s knowledge related to alertness about labor, found correlation of the scores with the maternal age, number of children and the guidance they received during pregnancy. Parity was a better predictor than educational level about knowledge of severe vaginal bleeding as a key danger during pregnancy. Those pregnant women who did not receive any kind of guidance, had lower scores of the correct answers, which showed the importance of guiding the women during their prenatal consultation. Ijang et al5 did a facility-based cross sectional study in North West, Cameroon and reported that 46.1% were aware of birth preparedness and complications readiness. The practice of birth preparedness and complications readiness was unsatisfactory as only 18.8% were considered prepared. Amenu et al. [6] reported that significant proportion of respondents were not knowledgeable about dangers in Southwest Ethiopia and in their study, educational status, place of last delivery, and antenatal visits were found important to predict awareness of BPCR

Also, Sahithi et al. [7] reported low knowledge of dangers during labour and delivery, and new born in Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Center, India. Hailu et al. [8] reported that the knowledge level of pregnant women about maternity dangers was low in Southern Ethiopia and was affected by residential area and researchers advocated that the identified deficiencies in awareness should be addressed through maternal and child health services by designing appropriate strategies including provision of targeted information, education and communication. The same was found in the present study also. Women had low and scatchy awareness. Of 2400 preconception women interviewed, only 801 (33.4%) talked about the labour events, around 60% did not talk of any. Of 2400 preconception women, 1015 (42.29%) were aware of some maternity dangers. Those who talked something also did not talk of real dangers and overall awareness was scatchy. Of 1040 pregnant women, 910 (87.5%) were aware of labour events and 870 (83.7%) were aware of some maternity dangers. So memory seemed to play a big role. More of pregnant women who had met health workers in recent past, could talk of events and dangers, 474 (54.5%) said preterm pains, 118 (13.5%) leaking, 97 (11.1%) epigastric pain, 73 (8.4%) headache, 67 (7.7%) vaginal bleeding and 41 (4.7%) decrease in fetal movements, with some overlap. But they also did not talk of real maternity dangers, like heavy viginal bleeding, convulsions, severe epigastric pain rupture uterus, retained placenta etc.

Mwilike et al. [2] reported that women in Urban Tanzania took appropriate action about seeking health care after recognizing dangers during pregnancy, however, majority had low knowledge of maternity dangers. In the study by Hibstu [9] it was revealed that maternal and paternal education, maternal age, paternal occupation, place of residence and time taken to reach health facility on foot were the main factors associated with knowledge of maternity dangers in women of Southern Ethiopia. Gebrehiwot et al. [10] suggested that health extension workers should strengthen their awareness creation activities by health education and community mobilization. Nurgi et al. [11] reported that the majority of their participants in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia who had knowledge of dangers had good practice, but overall participants’ knowledge and attitude still needed intervention to maximize their knowledge and needed to work with positive attitude.

Nithya et al. [12] suggested, lack of exposure to formal awareness, lack of health counseling as modifiable risk factors to improve knowledge about maternity dangers. Hibstu et al. [9] as well as Hailu et al. [13] reported that educational status of the mother, place of delivery were independently associated with knowledge of women about maternity dangers in Southern Ethiopia. Provision of information, education and communication targeting women, family and the general community on maternity dangers was recommended. Raising awareness of women about the maternity dangers is the first essential step in accepting appropriate and timely referral. In the present study even post graduate studied did not talk about real maternity dangers. Mellon et al. [14] did a study in California USA to assess the knowledge of pregnant women and male partners about several health risks posed by pregnancy to identify potential gaps in reproductive health literacy and reported that pregnant women and male partners had significant knowledge deficiencies concerning common and serious health hazards associated with pregnancy.

Perreira et al. [15] in their study evaluated the effectiveness of a set of information, education, and communication strategies designed to increase the awareness of maternity dangers among pregnant women of 4 regions of Southwestern Guatemala and reported that among women using health clinics, the likelihood of having heard of maternity dangers nearly tripled, when the clinic interventions were fully implemented. Those who had heard radio messages or participated in women’s groups were, respectively, 3 times and 5 times more likely to have heard of maternity dangers. A study by Okour et al. [16] to assess the level and determinants of awareness of the maternity dangers among pregnant Jordanian women revealed that awareness of danger signs was low and a need existed to provide prenatal care that included sufficient information about maternity dangers. Researchers opined that additional studies were warranted to address the knowledge gap and to plan interventions for improving health literacy. It was recommended to have structured mandatory health literacy sessions addressing the maternity dangers.

Doctor et al. [17] did a study in Northern Nigeria to better understand the pathways through which the sociodemographic environment affected awareness of maternity dangers, preparations for delivery, and skilled birth attendance and found that less than one-third pregnant women knew three or more danger signs of pregnancy or labor and delivery. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with knowledge of maternity dangers, but not with knowledge of life-threatening, critical dangers as was seen in the present study also. Of 1040 women, 94 (80.3%) out of 117 with one child were aware of some dangers, 54 (57.4%) preterm pains, 403 (87.4%) of 461 with many children talked of dangers, 209 (51.9%) preterm pains, 66 (16.4%) epigastric pain and 51 (12.7%) vaginal bleeding.

Sahithi et al. [7] did a study at KAMSRC, India to assess the awareness of maternity dangers among the women attending the outpatients and reported 73.5% of the respondents knew at least one danger sign during pregnancy, 67.5% respondents knew at least one maternity danger. Shamanewadi et al. [18] did a study in Southern India to assess the awareness of maternity dangers among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at primary health centers and reported women knew only 3 danger signs, vaginal bleeding, loss of consciousness and convulsions. Every pregnant woman faces the risk of sudden, unpredictable complications that could end in death or injury to her or her infant. Hence, it is necessary to employ strategies to overcome such problems as they arise. Felix et al. [3] did a study in India aimed to assess level of awareness about danger signs of pregnancy among antenatal women and to assess the factors associated with it and reported that level of awareness about danger signs among pregnant women was average. Researchers recommended interventions provision of health education, empowering women and improving the quality of health services.

Conclusion

Little more pregnant women than preconception women had awareness of undesirable maternity events and not really maternity dangers, but awareness was scatchy. Only one third rural tribal preconception women had awareness of undesirable events not really maternity dangers that too scatchy. Hardly anyone talked of real maternity dangers. A lot is needed to create awareness of maternity dangers which are preventable and treatable but less kill many rural women during pregnancy, birth and post birth.

Conflict of interest:

None.

References

  1. Hiluf M, Fantahun M (2007) Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness among women in Adigrat town, north Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev 22(1): pp. 14-20
  2. Mwilike B, Nalwadda G, Kagawa M, et al. (2018) Knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy and subsequent healthcare seeking actions among women in Urban Tanzania: a crosssectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 18(1): pp. 4.
  3. William Felix JA, Devi R, Manobharati M (2018) Level of awareness about pregnancy danger signs among pregnant women attending antenatal care, Chidambaram. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 5(6): pp. 2480-2485.
  4. Félix HC, Corrêa CC, Matias TG, et al. (2019) The Signs of alert and Labor: knowledge among pregnant women. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil 19(2): pp. 335-341.
  5. Ijang YP, Cumber SN, Nkfusai CN, et al. (2019) Awareness and practice of birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in the Bamenda Health District, Cameroon. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 19(1):pp. 371.
  6. . Amenu G, Mulaw Z, Seyoum T, et al. (2016) Knowledge about danger signs of obstetric complications and associated factors among postnatal mothers of Mechekel District Health Centers, East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2014. Scientifica 2016: pp. 3495416
  7. . Sahithi JK, Cuddapah GV (2017) Awareness of danger signs during pregnancy, labour, child birth and during the first seven days of life attending antenatal care at KAMSRC. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 6(9):4106-4110.
  8. Hailu M, Gebremariam A, Alemseged F (2010) Knowledge about obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in Aleta Wondo District, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 20(1): pp. 25-32.
  9. . Hibstu DT, Siyoum YD (2017) Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at health facilities of Yirgacheffe town, Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Arch Publ Health 75(1): pp. 35.
  10. Gebrehiwot H, Bahta S, Haile N (2014) Awareness of danger signs of pregnancy and its associated factors among pregnant women who visit ANC in Mekelle public hospitals. Open J Adv Drug Deliv 2(2): pp.164-173.
  11. Nurgi S, Tachbele E, Dibekulu W, et al. (2017) Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Obstetric Danger Signs during Pregnancy in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia. Health Sci J 11(6): pp. 1-7.
  12. Nithya R, Dorairajan G, Chinnakali P (2017) Do pregnant women know about danger signs of pregnancy and childbirth?–a study of the level of knowledge and its associated factors from a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Int J Adv Med Health Re 4(1): pp. 11.
  13. Hailu D, Berhe H (2014) Knowledge about obstetric danger signs and associated factors among mothers in Tsegedie District, Tigray Region, Ethiopia 2013: community based cross-sectional study. Plos one 9(2): pp. e83459.
  14. Mellon M, Schiller A, Nelson AL, et al. (2020) Awareness of Pregnancy-Associated Health Risks Among Pregnant Women and Male Partners Surveyed in a Prenatal Clinic. J Women’s Health 29(3): pp. 376-82.
  15. . Perreira KM, Bailey PE, de Bocaletti E, et al. (2002) Increasing awareness of danger signs in pregnancy through communityand clinic-based education in Guatemala. Matern Child Health J 6(1): pp. 19-28.
  16. Okour A, Alkhateeb M, Amarin Z (2012) Awareness of danger signs and symptoms of pregnancy complication among women in Jordan. Int J Gyne Obst 118(1): pp. 11-14.
  17. Doctor HV, Findley SE, Cometto G, et al. (2013) Awareness of critical danger signs of pregnancy and delivery, preparations for delivery, and utilization of skilled birth attendants in Nigeria. J Health Care Poor Underserved 24(1): pp. 152-70.
  18. Shamanewadi AN, Pavithra MB, Madhukumar S (2020) Level of awareness of risk factors and danger signs of pregnancy among pregnant women attending antenatal care in PHC, Nandagudi. J Family Med Prim Care 9(9): pp. 4717.
PDF    Google Scholar    
10.52916/jogs214013

Related Highlights

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
  • Pregnancy
  • Vaginal Surgery
  • Fallopian Tubes
  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Fecundity
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Birth Control
  • Genitourinary Medicine
  • Gynaecologic Oncology
  • Obstetrics
  • Oral Contraceptive
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Ovarian Research
  • Perinatal Infections
  • Semen Analysis
  • Cesarean Delivery
  • Hysterectomy
  • Maternal health
  • Sex Hormones
  • Sexual Development
  • Sperm Studies
  • Urological Disorders
  • Urology
  • Vaginal Estrogens

Related Journals

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecological Surgery, Biannually, published by Respub Journals.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). With this license readers can share, distribute, and download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited.
This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, in Scholarly Publishing.
This website: https://respubjournals.com/obstetrics-gynecological-surgery/ editorial contact: editor.jogs@respubjournals.com
Address: #999, Sector-31, Gurugram, Haryana, India

Stay Always In Touch

Ⓒ Copyright 2021. All Rights Reserved by Respub Journals